Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Merck & Co., Inc. or Viridian Therapeutics, Inc.

Merck vs. Viridian: SG&A Cost Strategies Unveiled

__timestampMerck & Co., Inc.Viridian Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014116060000007751000
Thursday, January 1, 20151031300000010251000
Friday, January 1, 201697620000009575000
Sunday, January 1, 2017983000000010912000
Monday, January 1, 20181010200000011049000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191061500000011646000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020895500000013265000
Friday, January 1, 2021963400000025805000
Saturday, January 1, 20221004200000035182000
Sunday, January 1, 20231050400000094999000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Merck & Co., Inc. and Viridian Therapeutics, Inc. have taken different paths in optimizing these costs.

Merck, a giant in the industry, has consistently maintained SG&A expenses around $10 billion annually, with a slight decrease of about 10% from 2014 to 2020. This stability reflects Merck's strategic cost management amidst fluctuating market conditions.

In contrast, Viridian, a smaller player, has seen its SG&A expenses skyrocket by over 1,100% from 2014 to 2023, indicating aggressive expansion and investment in growth.

This comparison highlights the diverse strategies companies employ in managing operational costs, with Merck focusing on efficiency and Viridian on growth. Understanding these strategies provides valuable insights into their long-term business models.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025