Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Novo Nordisk A/S or ADMA Biologics, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Novo Nordisk vs. ADMA Biologics

__timestampADMA Biologics, Inc.Novo Nordisk A/S
Wednesday, January 1, 2014482386926760000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015674596832169000000
Friday, January 1, 2016849474232339000000
Sunday, January 1, 20171809283532124000000
Monday, January 1, 20182250292233313000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192591075735830000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203505081736886000000
Friday, January 1, 20214289688941058000000
Saturday, January 1, 20225245802450684000000
Sunday, January 1, 20235902000061598000000
Monday, January 1, 202467377000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biopharma Giants

In the competitive world of biopharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Novo Nordisk A/S and ADMA Biologics, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management. From 2014 to 2023, Novo Nordisk's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 130%, reflecting its expansive global operations and marketing strategies. In contrast, ADMA Biologics, a smaller player, has seen a staggering 1,125% increase in SG&A costs, indicative of its aggressive growth and market penetration efforts.

While Novo Nordisk's expenses are significantly higher, they represent a smaller percentage of its overall revenue, showcasing efficient cost management. ADMA's rapid increase, though substantial, aligns with its strategic expansion. This analysis underscores the importance of balancing growth with cost efficiency in the biopharma sector.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025