Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Novo Nordisk A/S or United Therapeutics Corporation

SG&A Cost Strategies: Novo Nordisk vs. United Therapeutics

__timestampNovo Nordisk A/SUnited Therapeutics Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201426760000000381287000
Thursday, January 1, 201532169000000452612000
Friday, January 1, 201632339000000316800000
Sunday, January 1, 201732124000000330100000
Monday, January 1, 201833313000000265800000
Tuesday, January 1, 201935830000000336200000
Wednesday, January 1, 202036886000000423900000
Friday, January 1, 202141058000000467000000
Saturday, January 1, 202250684000000487000000
Sunday, January 1, 202361598000000477100000
Monday, January 1, 202467377000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Novo Nordisk A/S and United Therapeutics Corporation, two giants in the industry, have shown contrasting strategies over the past decade.

Novo Nordisk A/S: A Steady Climb

From 2014 to 2023, Novo Nordisk's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 130%, reflecting their aggressive expansion and marketing strategies. This Danish company, renowned for its diabetes care products, has consistently increased its spending, peaking in 2023.

United Therapeutics: A Conservative Approach

In contrast, United Therapeutics has maintained a more conservative approach, with SG&A expenses growing by just 25% over the same period. This American biotech firm, focused on rare diseases, has kept its costs relatively stable, showcasing a disciplined financial strategy.

Conclusion

While Novo Nordisk's strategy may indicate a focus on growth, United Therapeutics' approach highlights efficiency. Investors and analysts should consider these strategies when evaluating potential investments.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025