Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Salesforce, Inc. or NetApp, Inc.

Salesforce vs. NetApp: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampNetApp, Inc.Salesforce, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201421792000002764851000
Thursday, January 1, 201521974000003437032000
Friday, January 1, 201620990000003951445000
Sunday, January 1, 201719040000004777000000
Monday, January 1, 201820090000005760000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201919350000007410000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202018480000009634000000
Friday, January 1, 2021200100000011761000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022213600000014453000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023209400000016079000000
Monday, January 1, 2024213600000015411000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Tech Giants

In the competitive world of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Salesforce, Inc. and NetApp, Inc. have taken different paths in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2024, Salesforce's SG&A expenses surged by nearly 460%, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy. In contrast, NetApp maintained a more stable trajectory, with expenses fluctuating around a modest 3% increase over the same period.

Salesforce's rapid expansion is evident, with SG&A costs peaking at $15.4 billion in 2024, a significant leap from $2.8 billion in 2014. Meanwhile, NetApp's expenses remained relatively steady, peaking at $2.2 billion in 2015 and 2024. This comparison highlights Salesforce's focus on scaling operations, while NetApp emphasizes cost control. As these companies continue to evolve, their strategies in managing SG&A expenses will be pivotal in shaping their financial futures.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025