__timestamp | Catalent, Inc. | Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 334800000 | 17986000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 337300000 | 32480000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 358100000 | 68081000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 402600000 | 169906000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 462600000 | 248932000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 512000000 | 354100000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 577900000 | 433300000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 687000000 | 583300000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 844000000 | 752700000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 831000000 | 887600000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 935000000 | 1007200000 |
Cracking the code
In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, understanding financial trends is crucial. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two industry leaders: Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Catalent, Inc., from 2014 to 2023.
Catalent, Inc. has shown a consistent upward trajectory in SG&A expenses, reflecting its strategic investments in growth and expansion. From 2014 to 2023, Catalent's expenses surged by approximately 180%, peaking in 2024. This trend underscores Catalent's commitment to scaling its operations and enhancing its market presence.
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. experienced a remarkable increase in SG&A expenses, with a staggering growth of nearly 4,800% from 2014 to 2023. This dramatic rise highlights the company's aggressive expansion strategy and its focus on innovation and market penetration.
While Catalent's growth is steady, Neurocrine's rapid escalation in expenses suggests a more aggressive approach to capturing market share. These insights provide a window into the strategic priorities of these biotech giants.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Eli Lilly and Company vs Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. Trends and Insights
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company or Catalent, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Gilead Sciences, Inc. vs Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. vs Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Dynavax Technologies Corporation
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. vs Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Catalent, Inc. vs Cytokinetics, Incorporated
Catalent, Inc. or Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Catalent, Inc. or Perrigo Company plc