Comparing SG&A Expenses: Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. vs Catalent, Inc. Trends and Insights

Biotech Giants' SG&A Expenses: A Decade of Growth and Strategy

__timestampCatalent, Inc.Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201433480000017986000
Thursday, January 1, 201533730000032480000
Friday, January 1, 201635810000068081000
Sunday, January 1, 2017402600000169906000
Monday, January 1, 2018462600000248932000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019512000000354100000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020577900000433300000
Friday, January 1, 2021687000000583300000
Saturday, January 1, 2022844000000752700000
Sunday, January 1, 2023831000000887600000
Monday, January 1, 20249350000001007200000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Biotech Giants

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, understanding financial trends is crucial. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two industry leaders: Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Catalent, Inc., from 2014 to 2023.

Catalent, Inc.: Steady Growth

Catalent, Inc. has shown a consistent upward trajectory in SG&A expenses, reflecting its strategic investments in growth and expansion. From 2014 to 2023, Catalent's expenses surged by approximately 180%, peaking in 2024. This trend underscores Catalent's commitment to scaling its operations and enhancing its market presence.

Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.: Rapid Expansion

Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. experienced a remarkable increase in SG&A expenses, with a staggering growth of nearly 4,800% from 2014 to 2023. This dramatic rise highlights the company's aggressive expansion strategy and its focus on innovation and market penetration.

While Catalent's growth is steady, Neurocrine's rapid escalation in expenses suggests a more aggressive approach to capturing market share. These insights provide a window into the strategic priorities of these biotech giants.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025