Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. or Blueprint Medicines Corporation

Biotech Giants: SG&A Cost Strategies Compared

__timestampBlueprint Medicines CorporationSarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014789000049315000
Thursday, January 1, 20151445600075043000
Friday, January 1, 20161921800083749000
Sunday, January 1, 201727986000122682000
Monday, January 1, 201847928000207761000
Tuesday, January 1, 201996388000284812000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020157743000317875000
Friday, January 1, 2021195293000282660000
Saturday, January 1, 2022237374000451421000
Sunday, January 1, 2023295141000481871000
Monday, January 1, 2024359272000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Over the past decade, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. and Blueprint Medicines Corporation have shown distinct strategies in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Sarepta's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 878%, peaking in 2023. In contrast, Blueprint Medicines saw a more modest increase of around 3,640% over the same period, indicating a more aggressive expansion strategy.

Sarepta's expenses consistently outpaced Blueprint's, with 2023 figures showing Sarepta's costs were about 63% higher. This trend suggests Sarepta's focus on scaling operations, while Blueprint's gradual increase reflects a more controlled growth approach. Understanding these dynamics offers valuable insights into how biotech companies balance growth with cost management, a critical factor for investors and industry analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025