Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. or Xencor, Inc.

Biotech Giants: SG&A Cost Strategies Compared

__timestampSarepta Therapeutics, Inc.Xencor, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014493150007461000
Thursday, January 1, 20157504300011960000
Friday, January 1, 20168374900013108000
Sunday, January 1, 201712268200017501000
Monday, January 1, 201820776100022472000
Tuesday, January 1, 201928481200024286000
Wednesday, January 1, 202031787500029689000
Friday, January 1, 202128266000038837000
Saturday, January 1, 202245142100047489000
Sunday, January 1, 202348187100053379000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Over the past decade, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. and Xencor, Inc. have shown contrasting strategies in this area. From 2014 to 2023, Sarepta's SG&A expenses surged by over 870%, reflecting its aggressive growth and expansion strategy. In contrast, Xencor maintained a more conservative approach, with a 615% increase, indicating a focus on cost efficiency.

Sarepta's expenses peaked in 2023, reaching nearly 10 times their 2014 levels, while Xencor's expenses grew to about 7 times their initial value. This divergence highlights the different paths these companies have taken in scaling their operations. As investors and industry watchers analyze these trends, the question remains: which strategy will yield better long-term returns?

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025