Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited or BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Takeda vs. BioCryst

__timestampBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 20147461000612613000000
Thursday, January 1, 201513047000650773000000
Friday, January 1, 201611253000619061000000
Sunday, January 1, 201713933000628106000000
Monday, January 1, 201829514000717599000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201937121000964737000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202067929000875663000000
Friday, January 1, 2021118818000886361000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022159371000997309000000
Sunday, January 1, 20232138940001053819000000
Monday, January 1, 20241053819000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Pharmaceutical Giants

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. offer a fascinating study in contrasts. Over the past decade, Takeda's SG&A expenses have consistently dwarfed those of BioCryst, with figures reaching over 1 trillion yen in 2023. In contrast, BioCryst's expenses have grown from a modest 7 million yen in 2014 to over 200 million yen in 2023, reflecting a significant increase of nearly 2800%.

While Takeda's expenses are higher, they reflect its expansive global operations. BioCryst, on the other hand, shows a rapid growth trajectory, indicating aggressive expansion and investment in its operations. The data from 2014 to 2023 highlights the strategic differences in cost management between these two companies, offering insights into their operational priorities and market strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025