Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? United Therapeutics Corporation or Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.

Biotech Giants' SG&A Strategies: A Decade of Divergence

__timestampIovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.United Therapeutics Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20149335772381287000
Thursday, January 1, 201512390000452612000
Friday, January 1, 201625602000316800000
Sunday, January 1, 201721262000330100000
Monday, January 1, 201828430000265800000
Tuesday, January 1, 201940849000336200000
Wednesday, January 1, 202060210000423900000
Friday, January 1, 202183664000467000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022104097000487000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023106916000477100000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotech Giants

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, United Therapeutics Corporation and Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs.

From 2014 to 2023, United Therapeutics consistently maintained higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $487 million in 2022. This reflects their expansive operational scale and robust market presence. In contrast, Iovance Biotherapeutics, with a more focused approach, saw their SG&A expenses grow from around $9 million in 2014 to over $107 million in 2023, marking a significant increase of over 1000%.

While United Therapeutics' expenses are nearly ten times that of Iovance, the latter's rapid growth suggests a strategic investment in scaling operations. This comparison highlights the diverse approaches within the biotech sector, where both expansion and efficiency play pivotal roles in financial strategy.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025