Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

Biotech Giants' SG&A Spending: A Decade of Strategic Growth

__timestampIovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014933577217986000
Thursday, January 1, 20151239000032480000
Friday, January 1, 20162560200068081000
Sunday, January 1, 201721262000169906000
Monday, January 1, 201828430000248932000
Tuesday, January 1, 201940849000354100000
Wednesday, January 1, 202060210000433300000
Friday, January 1, 202183664000583300000
Saturday, January 1, 2022104097000752700000
Sunday, January 1, 2023106916000887600000
Monday, January 1, 20241007200000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

SG&A Spending Patterns: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the dynamic world of biotechnology, understanding financial trends is crucial for investors and stakeholders. This analysis compares the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. over the past decade.

A Decade of Growth

From 2014 to 2023, Neurocrine Biosciences has consistently outpaced Iovance in SG&A spending, reflecting its expansive growth strategy. Neurocrine's SG&A expenses surged by nearly 500% over this period, peaking in 2023. In contrast, Iovance's expenses grew by approximately 1,000%, albeit from a smaller base, indicating its aggressive push into the market.

Strategic Implications

These spending patterns highlight differing strategic priorities. Neurocrine's steady increase suggests a focus on sustainable growth, while Iovance's rapid rise points to a more aggressive expansion strategy. Investors should consider these trends when evaluating potential returns and risks in the biotech sector.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025