Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Blueprint Medicines Corporation and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

SG&A Trends: Blueprint vs. BioCryst Over a Decade

__timestampBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Blueprint Medicines Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201474610007890000
Thursday, January 1, 20151304700014456000
Friday, January 1, 20161125300019218000
Sunday, January 1, 20171393300027986000
Monday, January 1, 20182951400047928000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193712100096388000
Wednesday, January 1, 202067929000157743000
Friday, January 1, 2021118818000195293000
Saturday, January 1, 2022159371000237374000
Sunday, January 1, 2023213894000295141000
Monday, January 1, 2024359272000
ngram

A Decade of SG&A Evolution: Blueprint Medicines vs. BioCryst Pharmaceuticals

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, operational efficiency is paramount. Over the past decade, Blueprint Medicines Corporation and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have demonstrated distinct trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Blueprint Medicines saw a staggering increase of over 3,600% in SG&A costs, peaking in 2023. In contrast, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals experienced a more modest rise of approximately 2,800% during the same period. This divergence highlights Blueprint's aggressive expansion strategy, possibly reflecting its investment in scaling operations and market penetration. Meanwhile, BioCryst's steadier growth suggests a more conservative approach, potentially focusing on sustainable development. As these companies continue to evolve, their SG&A trends offer valuable insights into their strategic priorities and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025