__timestamp | U-Haul Holding Company | XPO Logistics, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 257168000 | 422500000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 238558000 | 1113400000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 217216000 | 1651200000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 220053000 | 1656500000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 219271000 | 1837000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 133435000 | 1845000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 201718000 | 2172000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 207982000 | 1322000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 216557000 | 678000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 58753000 | 167000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 32654000 | 134000000 |
Cracking the code
In the ever-evolving logistics and transportation industry, understanding the financial strategies of key players is crucial. Over the past decade, XPO Logistics, Inc. and U-Haul Holding Company have demonstrated contrasting approaches to their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, XPO Logistics saw a significant rise in SG&A expenses, peaking in 2020 with a staggering 2.17 billion dollars, reflecting a strategic expansion and investment in operations. In contrast, U-Haul's SG&A expenses remained relatively stable, with a notable decrease of approximately 77% from 2014 to 2023, indicating a more conservative financial strategy. This divergence highlights the different paths these companies have taken in response to market demands and operational goals. As we look to the future, these spending patterns may offer insights into their competitive positioning and market adaptability.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: XPO Logistics, Inc. vs U-Haul Holding Company
Gross Profit Trends Compared: XPO Logistics, Inc. vs U-Haul Holding Company
XPO Logistics, Inc. vs Pool Corporation: SG&A Expense Trends
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? XPO Logistics, Inc. or Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: XPO Logistics, Inc. vs Saia, Inc.