A Professional Review of EBITDA: Thomson Reuters Corporation Compared to Owens Corning

EBITDA Showdown: Thomson Reuters vs. Owens Corning

__timestampOwens CorningThomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20146500000004289000000
Thursday, January 1, 20158530000003151000000
Friday, January 1, 201610410000002999000000
Sunday, January 1, 201711340000001495930891
Monday, January 1, 201812660000001345686008
Tuesday, January 1, 201911780000001913474675
Wednesday, January 1, 20203410000002757000000
Friday, January 1, 202119090000001994296441
Saturday, January 1, 202222000000003010000000
Sunday, January 1, 202321660000002950000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

A Decade of EBITDA: Thomson Reuters vs. Owens Corning

In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, understanding a company's financial health is crucial. EBITDA, or Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization, serves as a key indicator of operational performance. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2023, Thomson Reuters Corporation and Owens Corning have showcased contrasting EBITDA trajectories.

Thomson Reuters, a giant in the information services sector, experienced a notable decline of approximately 31% in EBITDA from 2014 to 2023. In contrast, Owens Corning, a leader in building materials, saw a remarkable growth of around 233% during the same period. This divergence highlights the resilience and adaptability of Owens Corning amidst market challenges.

The data reveals a pivotal shift in 2020, where Owens Corning's EBITDA surged by over 460%, while Thomson Reuters faced a downturn. This trend underscores the dynamic nature of industry-specific challenges and opportunities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025