A Professional Review of EBITDA: Thomson Reuters Corporation Compared to RB Global, Inc.

Thomson Reuters vs. RB Global: A Decade of EBITDA Insights

__timestampRB Global, Inc.Thomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20141788510004289000000
Thursday, January 1, 20152114170003151000000
Friday, January 1, 20161747912912999000000
Sunday, January 1, 20171683790001495930891
Monday, January 1, 20182636530001345686008
Tuesday, January 1, 20193221401101913474675
Wednesday, January 1, 20203586170002757000000
Friday, January 1, 20213399284241994296441
Saturday, January 1, 20225573991513010000000
Sunday, January 1, 20239758740872950000000
Monday, January 1, 2024761100000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

A Decade of EBITDA: Thomson Reuters vs. RB Global

In the ever-evolving landscape of global finance, EBITDA serves as a crucial metric for evaluating a company's operational performance. Over the past decade, Thomson Reuters Corporation and RB Global, Inc. have showcased contrasting trajectories in their EBITDA figures. From 2014 to 2023, Thomson Reuters consistently outperformed RB Global, with an average EBITDA nearly ten times higher. However, RB Global has shown remarkable growth, with a 446% increase from 2014 to 2023, peaking at nearly $976 million. In contrast, Thomson Reuters experienced a 31% decline from its 2014 peak, reflecting strategic shifts and market challenges. This comparison highlights the dynamic nature of financial performance and the importance of strategic adaptability in maintaining competitive advantage. As the financial world continues to evolve, these insights offer valuable lessons for investors and industry leaders alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025