| __timestamp | Pentair plc | Thomson Reuters Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1109300000 | 4289000000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 842400000 | 3151000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 890400000 | 2999000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 488600000 | 1495930891 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 552800000 | 1345686008 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 513200000 | 1913474675 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 527600000 | 2757000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 714400000 | 1994296441 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 830400000 | 3010000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 852000000 | 2950000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 803800000 |
In pursuit of knowledge
In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, understanding the financial health of corporations is crucial. This analysis delves into the EBITDA performance of Thomson Reuters Corporation and Pentair plc from 2014 to 2023. Over this decade, Thomson Reuters consistently outperformed Pentair, with an average EBITDA nearly three times higher. However, both companies experienced fluctuations. Notably, Thomson Reuters saw a significant dip in 2017, with EBITDA dropping to approximately 35% of its 2014 peak. Meanwhile, Pentair's EBITDA showed a more stable trajectory, albeit with a notable decline in 2017, reaching its lowest point. By 2023, both companies had rebounded, with Thomson Reuters achieving an EBITDA of nearly 69% of its 2014 value, while Pentair reached 77% of its peak. This data underscores the resilience and adaptability of these corporations in navigating economic challenges.
Breaking Down Revenue Trends: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Pentair plc
Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Pentair plc: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Gross Profit Analysis: Comparing Thomson Reuters Corporation and Pentair plc
A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: Thomson Reuters Corporation and Carlisle Companies Incorporated
Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs TransUnion
A Professional Review of EBITDA: Thomson Reuters Corporation Compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Pentair plc
EBITDA Performance Review: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
A Professional Review of EBITDA: Thomson Reuters Corporation Compared to RB Global, Inc.
EBITDA Performance Review: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs IDEX Corporation
A Professional Review of EBITDA: Thomson Reuters Corporation Compared to Owens Corning