AbbVie Inc. or CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Comparing SG&A cost strategies of AbbVie and CymaBay.

__timestampAbbVie Inc.CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201477240000008185000
Thursday, January 1, 201563870000008871000
Friday, January 1, 201658550000009645000
Sunday, January 1, 2017627500000012387000
Monday, January 1, 2018739900000014381000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019694200000019238000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201129900000017425000
Friday, January 1, 20211234900000023040000
Saturday, January 1, 20221526000000025116000
Sunday, January 1, 20231287200000051953000
Monday, January 1, 202414752000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

SG&A Cost Management: AbbVie Inc. vs. CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, AbbVie Inc. and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management. From 2014 to 2023, AbbVie Inc. consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $12.9 billion in 2023. This reflects a strategic investment in expansive operations and marketing efforts. In contrast, CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. maintained a leaner SG&A structure, with expenses reaching around $51.9 million in 2023, a significant increase from previous years but still a fraction of AbbVie's costs. This disparity highlights CymaBay's focus on cost efficiency and targeted spending. As the industry evolves, these strategies will play a pivotal role in shaping each company's financial health and market position.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025