Alkermes plc or CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Alkermes vs. CymaBay: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestampAlkermes plcCymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141999050008185000
Thursday, January 1, 20153115580008871000
Friday, January 1, 20163741300009645000
Sunday, January 1, 201742157800012387000
Monday, January 1, 201852640800014381000
Tuesday, January 1, 201959944900019238000
Wednesday, January 1, 202053882700017425000
Friday, January 1, 202156097700023040000
Saturday, January 1, 202260574700025116000
Sunday, January 1, 202368975100051953000
Monday, January 1, 2024645238000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

SG&A Cost Management: Alkermes plc vs. CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.

In the competitive landscape of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Alkermes plc and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management.

From 2014 to 2023, Alkermes plc's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 245%, reflecting their expansive operational strategies. In contrast, CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. has maintained a more conservative growth in SG&A costs, increasing by about 535% over the same period, albeit from a much smaller base.

This data suggests that while Alkermes plc invests heavily in administrative and sales functions, CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. adopts a more restrained approach. Investors and stakeholders should consider these trends when evaluating the companies' financial health and strategic priorities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025