Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. vs Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends

Biotech Giants' SG&A Expenses: A Decade of Divergence

__timestampAlnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20144452600010337679
Thursday, January 1, 20156061000018187286
Friday, January 1, 20168935400024758063
Sunday, January 1, 201719936500023666957
Monday, January 1, 201838235900030099855
Tuesday, January 1, 201947900500064947625
Wednesday, January 1, 2020588420000186363444
Friday, January 1, 2021620639000272611040
Saturday, January 1, 2022770658000358782000
Sunday, January 1, 2023795646000409864000
Monday, January 1, 2024975526000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

SG&A Expense Trends: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals vs. Intra-Cellular Therapies

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, understanding the financial strategies of leading companies is crucial. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals and Intra-Cellular Therapies have shown distinct trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Alnylam's SG&A expenses surged by over 1,600%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and market penetration strategies. In contrast, Intra-Cellular Therapies exhibited a more moderate increase of approximately 3,900%, indicating a steady growth approach.

By 2023, Alnylam's SG&A expenses reached nearly double those of Intra-Cellular Therapies, highlighting its larger scale of operations. This divergence in financial strategy underscores the varied paths companies take in the biotech sector to achieve growth and maintain competitiveness. Investors and industry analysts should consider these trends when evaluating the financial health and strategic direction of these companies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025