| __timestamp | Analog Devices, Inc. | Applied Materials, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1034585000 | 5229000000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1175830000 | 5707000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1194236000 | 6314000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 2045907000 | 8005000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1967640000 | 9436000000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 1977315000 | 8222000000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1912578000 | 9510000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 2793274000 | 12149000000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 4481479000 | 13792000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 4428321000 | 14133000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 4045814000 | 14279000000 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
In the ever-evolving landscape of semiconductor manufacturing, Applied Materials, Inc. and Analog Devices, Inc. stand as titans. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2024, these companies have showcased distinct trajectories in their cost of revenue. Applied Materials, Inc. has consistently outpaced Analog Devices, Inc., with its cost of revenue peaking at approximately $14.3 billion in 2024, marking a 173% increase from 2014. In contrast, Analog Devices, Inc. saw a more modest growth, with its cost of revenue rising by about 291% over the same period, reaching around $4 billion in 2024. This divergence highlights the varying strategies and market dynamics each company faces. As the semiconductor industry continues to expand, understanding these financial trends offers valuable insights into the operational efficiencies and market positioning of these industry leaders.
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Analog Devices, Inc.: Annual Revenue Growth Compared
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Sony Group Corporation
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Applied Materials, Inc. and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s Expenses
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Fiserv, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Applied Materials, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Lam Research Corporation
Cost of Revenue Trends: Applied Materials, Inc. vs KLA Corporation
Key Insights on Gross Profit: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Analog Devices, Inc.
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Applied Materials, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc.
Who Prioritizes Innovation? R&D Spending Compared for Applied Materials, Inc. and Analog Devices, Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Analog Devices, Inc. Trends and Insights
Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Analog Devices, Inc.