__timestamp | Analog Devices, Inc. | Applied Materials, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 454676000 | 890000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 478972000 | 897000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 461438000 | 819000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 691046000 | 890000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 695937000 | 1002000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 648094000 | 982000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 659923000 | 1093000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 915418000 | 1229000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1266175000 | 1438000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1273584000 | 1628000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1068640000 | 1797000000 |
Data in motion
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding the financial strategies of industry leaders is crucial. Over the past decade, Applied Materials, Inc. and Analog Devices, Inc. have showcased distinct trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2024, Applied Materials consistently outpaced Analog Devices, with a notable 60% higher average SG&A expense. This trend highlights Applied Materials' aggressive investment in administrative and sales functions, peaking in 2024 with a 1.8 billion dollar expenditure. In contrast, Analog Devices maintained a more conservative approach, with a steady increase culminating in a 1.3 billion dollar expense in 2023. These financial strategies reflect each company's unique approach to growth and market positioning. As we look to the future, these trends offer valuable insights into the operational priorities of these tech titans.
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Analog Devices, Inc.: Annual Revenue Growth Compared
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and Analog Devices, Inc.
Key Insights on Gross Profit: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Analog Devices, Inc.
Who Prioritizes Innovation? R&D Spending Compared for Applied Materials, Inc. and Analog Devices, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Lam Research Corporation Trends and Insights
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Applied Materials, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or KLA Corporation
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Applied Materials, Inc. and Amphenol Corporation
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Intel Corporation
Applied Materials, Inc. and Infosys Limited: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Analog Devices, Inc.