Comparing SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Analog Devices, Inc. Trends and Insights

Tech Giants' SG&A Strategies: A Decade of Insights

__timestampAnalog Devices, Inc.Applied Materials, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014454676000890000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015478972000897000000
Friday, January 1, 2016461438000819000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017691046000890000000
Monday, January 1, 20186959370001002000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019648094000982000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206599230001093000000
Friday, January 1, 20219154180001229000000
Saturday, January 1, 202212661750001438000000
Sunday, January 1, 202312735840001628000000
Monday, January 1, 202410686400001797000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Tech Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding the financial strategies of industry leaders is crucial. Over the past decade, Applied Materials, Inc. and Analog Devices, Inc. have showcased distinct trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2024, Applied Materials consistently outpaced Analog Devices, with a notable 60% higher average SG&A expense. This trend highlights Applied Materials' aggressive investment in administrative and sales functions, peaking in 2024 with a 1.8 billion dollar expenditure. In contrast, Analog Devices maintained a more conservative approach, with a steady increase culminating in a 1.3 billion dollar expense in 2023. These financial strategies reflect each company's unique approach to growth and market positioning. As we look to the future, these trends offer valuable insights into the operational priorities of these tech titans.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025