Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Western Digital Corporation

Tech Giants' Cost Efficiency: A Decade in Review

__timestampApplied Materials, Inc.Western Digital Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014522900000010770000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015570700000010351000000
Friday, January 1, 201663140000009559000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017800500000013021000000
Monday, January 1, 2018943600000012942000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019822200000012817000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020951000000012955000000
Friday, January 1, 20211214900000012401000000
Saturday, January 1, 20221379200000012919000000
Sunday, January 1, 20231413300000010431000000
Monday, January 1, 20241427900000010058000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

A Decade of Cost Efficiency: Applied Materials vs. Western Digital

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, cost efficiency remains a pivotal factor for success. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2024, Applied Materials, Inc. and Western Digital Corporation have showcased contrasting trends in their cost of revenue. Applied Materials has demonstrated a remarkable 173% increase in cost efficiency, with costs rising from approximately $5.2 billion in 2014 to $14.3 billion in 2024. This growth reflects their strategic investments and scaling operations. In contrast, Western Digital's cost of revenue peaked in 2017 at $13 billion, followed by a gradual decline to $10 billion in 2024, indicating a shift in their operational strategy. This comparison highlights the dynamic nature of cost management in the tech industry, where companies must continuously adapt to maintain competitive advantage. As we look to the future, these trends offer valuable insights into the financial strategies of leading tech giants.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025