| __timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 5229000000 | 176541000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 5707000000 | 189057000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 6314000000 | 202003000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 8005000000 | 212963000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 9436000000 | 201379000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 8222000000 | 215400000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 9510000000 | 226500000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 12149000000 | 258100000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 13792000000 | 304400000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 14133000000 | 282600000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 14279000000 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for evaluating a company's financial health. Applied Materials, Inc., a leader in materials engineering solutions, has seen its cost of revenue grow by approximately 173% from 2014 to 2023. This reflects its expanding operations and increased production capabilities. In contrast, Check Point Software Technologies Ltd., a cybersecurity giant, has maintained a relatively stable cost of revenue, with a modest increase of around 60% over the same period. This stability highlights Check Point's efficient cost management in a competitive industry.
From 2014 to 2023, Applied Materials' cost of revenue surged, peaking in 2024, while Check Point's data for 2024 remains unavailable. This missing data suggests potential shifts in Check Point's financial strategy. As these companies navigate their respective markets, their cost of revenue trends offer valuable insights into their operational strategies and market positions.
Applied Materials, Inc. and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.: A Comprehensive Revenue Analysis
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. vs STMicroelectronics N.V.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and Seagate Technology Holdings plc
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Western Digital Corporation
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Pure Storage, Inc.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and Zebra Technologies Corporation
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. vs ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Gross Profit Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. Trends
Analyzing R&D Budgets: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
EBITDA Analysis: Evaluating Applied Materials, Inc. Against Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.