Cost of Revenue Comparison: ASML Holding N.V. vs STMicroelectronics N.V.

ASML vs STM: A Decade of Cost Evolution

__timestampASML Holding N.V.STMicroelectronics N.V.
Wednesday, January 1, 201433589070005321000000
Thursday, January 1, 201533917000004907000000
Friday, January 1, 201637503000004731000000
Sunday, January 1, 201749761000005313000000
Monday, January 1, 201862257000006096000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201969199000005860000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202071813000006819000000
Friday, January 1, 202188020000007708000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022106607000008797000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023134224000008999000000
Monday, January 1, 202413770900000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving semiconductor industry, ASML Holding N.V. and STMicroelectronics N.V. stand as titans, each with a unique trajectory in cost management. Over the past decade, ASML's cost of revenue has surged by approximately 300%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and innovation strategies. In contrast, STMicroelectronics has maintained a more stable growth, with a 69% increase since 2014.

A Decade of Transformation

From 2014 to 2023, ASML's cost of revenue grew from $3.4 billion to $13.4 billion, underscoring its pivotal role in advancing lithography technology. Meanwhile, STMicroelectronics, with a more diversified product portfolio, saw its costs rise from $5.3 billion to $9 billion. This divergence highlights ASML's focus on high-cost, high-reward technologies, while STMicroelectronics balances innovation with cost efficiency.

The Road Ahead

As the semiconductor landscape continues to shift, these companies' cost strategies will be crucial in shaping their future competitiveness.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025