Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: ASML Holding N.V. vs PTC Inc.

ASML vs. PTC: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampASML Holding N.V.PTC Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20143358907000373683000
Thursday, January 1, 20153391700000334734000
Friday, January 1, 20163750300000325665000
Sunday, January 1, 20174976100000329019000
Monday, January 1, 20186225700000326194000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196919900000325378000
Wednesday, January 1, 20207181300000334271000
Friday, January 1, 20218802000000371102000
Saturday, January 1, 202210660700000385980000
Sunday, January 1, 202313422400000441006000
Monday, January 1, 202413770900000486834000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Cost of Revenue Efficiency: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding cost efficiency is crucial. ASML Holding N.V. and PTC Inc. offer a fascinating study in contrasts. Over the past decade, ASML's cost of revenue has surged by approximately 300%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and investment in cutting-edge semiconductor technology. In contrast, PTC Inc. has maintained a relatively stable cost structure, with only a modest increase of around 30% since 2014.

A Decade of Change

From 2014 to 2023, ASML's cost of revenue grew from $3.4 billion to an impressive $13.4 billion, highlighting its strategic focus on scaling operations. Meanwhile, PTC Inc.'s cost of revenue rose from $374 million to $441 million, showcasing its steady approach. This divergence underscores the different paths these companies have taken in their pursuit of growth and efficiency.

Missing Data

While the data for 2024 is incomplete for ASML, PTC Inc. continues its upward trend, reaching $487 million.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025