Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Rentokil Initial plc

Comparative Cost Analysis: Curtiss-Wright vs. Rentokil Initial

__timestampCurtiss-Wright CorporationRentokil Initial plc
Wednesday, January 1, 20141466610000297500000
Thursday, January 1, 20151422428000310200000
Friday, January 1, 20161358448000376100000
Sunday, January 1, 20171452431000474900000
Monday, January 1, 20181540574000514200000
Tuesday, January 1, 201915892160002099000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202015501090002136400000
Friday, January 1, 202115725750002239100000
Saturday, January 1, 202216024160002737000000
Sunday, January 1, 20231778195000927000000
Monday, January 1, 20241967640000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Analyzing Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for evaluating a company's financial health. This analysis focuses on Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Rentokil Initial plc, two giants in their respective industries. Over the past decade, Curtiss-Wright has shown a steady increase in its cost of revenue, peaking in 2023 with a 30% rise from 2014. In contrast, Rentokil Initial plc experienced a dramatic surge, particularly between 2018 and 2022, where its cost of revenue nearly quadrupled, reflecting its aggressive expansion strategy. However, 2023 saw a significant drop, indicating potential strategic shifts or market challenges. This comparative analysis not only highlights the financial strategies of these companies but also offers insights into broader market trends. As businesses navigate the complexities of the modern economy, such data-driven insights are invaluable for stakeholders and investors alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025