__timestamp | Curtiss-Wright Corporation | ITT Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1466610000 | 1788200000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1422428000 | 1676500000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1358448000 | 1647200000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1452431000 | 1768100000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1540574000 | 1857900000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 1589216000 | 1936300000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1550109000 | 1695600000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1572575000 | 1865500000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1602416000 | 2065400000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1778195000 | 2175700000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1967640000 | 2383400000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the competitive landscape of industrial manufacturing, cost efficiency is a critical metric. From 2014 to 2023, Curtiss-Wright Corporation and ITT Inc. have demonstrated distinct trends in their cost of revenue. Curtiss-Wright's cost efficiency improved by approximately 22% over this period, with a notable peak in 2023. Meanwhile, ITT Inc. saw a 22% increase in cost of revenue, indicating a different strategic approach.
These trends highlight the contrasting strategies of these industrial giants, offering valuable insights for investors and industry analysts.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Curtiss-Wright Corporation vs C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Comparing Revenue Performance: Curtiss-Wright Corporation or ITT Inc.?
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Nordson Corporation
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Rentokil Initial plc
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Allegion plc
Cost of Revenue Trends: Curtiss-Wright Corporation vs American Airlines Group Inc.
Who Generates Higher Gross Profit? Curtiss-Wright Corporation or ITT Inc.
R&D Insights: How Curtiss-Wright Corporation and ITT Inc. Allocate Funds
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Curtiss-Wright Corporation vs ITT Inc.
A Professional Review of EBITDA: Curtiss-Wright Corporation Compared to ITT Inc.