Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? ASML Holding N.V. or Zebra Technologies Corporation

ASML vs. Zebra: SG&A Cost Optimization Battle

__timestampASML Holding N.V.Zebra Technologies Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014318672000351518000
Thursday, January 1, 2015345700000763025000
Friday, January 1, 2016374800000751000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017416600000749000000
Monday, January 1, 2018488000000811000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019520500000826000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020544900000787000000
Friday, January 1, 2021725600000935000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022909600000982000000
Sunday, January 1, 20231113200000915000000
Monday, January 1, 20241165700000981000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Comparative Analysis

In the competitive landscape of global technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. ASML Holding N.V. and Zebra Technologies Corporation, two giants in their respective fields, have shown distinct strategies in optimizing these costs over the past decade.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

From 2014 to 2023, ASML Holding N.V. has seen a significant increase in SG&A expenses, rising by approximately 250%. This growth reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in innovation. In contrast, Zebra Technologies Corporation's SG&A expenses have grown by about 160%, indicating a more conservative approach.

Strategic Insights

ASML's expenses peaked in 2023, reaching a 22% higher level than Zebra's. This suggests a strategic focus on scaling operations. Meanwhile, Zebra's steadier expense growth points to a focus on efficiency and cost control. Understanding these trends offers valuable insights into how these companies balance growth and operational efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025