BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. or Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

BioMarin vs. Sarepta: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampBioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201430215600049315000
Thursday, January 1, 201540227100075043000
Friday, January 1, 201647659300083749000
Sunday, January 1, 2017554336000122682000
Monday, January 1, 2018604353000207761000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019680924000284812000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020737669000317875000
Friday, January 1, 2021759375000282660000
Saturday, January 1, 2022854009000451421000
Sunday, January 1, 2023937300000481871000
Monday, January 1, 20241009025000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

BioMarin vs. Sarepta: A Decade of SG&A Management

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Over the past decade, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. and Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. have shown distinct strategies in handling these costs. From 2014 to 2023, BioMarin's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 210%, peaking in 2023. In contrast, Sarepta's expenses increased by nearly 880% during the same period, reflecting its aggressive expansion strategy. While BioMarin's expenses were consistently higher, their growth rate was more controlled, suggesting a focus on sustainable scaling. Sarepta's rapid increase indicates a bold approach, possibly investing heavily in market penetration and R&D. This comparison highlights the strategic choices companies make in balancing growth and cost management, offering valuable insights for investors and industry analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025