Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: ADMA Biologics, Inc. vs ImmunityBio, Inc.

Biotech Giants' SG&A Strategies: A Decade of Financial Insights

__timestampADMA Biologics, Inc.ImmunityBio, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201448238694326000
Thursday, January 1, 20156745968226206000
Friday, January 1, 2016849474294391000
Sunday, January 1, 20171809283553821000
Monday, January 1, 20182250292235463000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192591075746456000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203505081771318000
Friday, January 1, 202142896889135256000
Saturday, January 1, 202252458024102708000
Sunday, January 1, 202359020000129620000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: ADMA Biologics, Inc. vs ImmunityBio, Inc.

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, understanding the financial strategies of key players is crucial. Over the past decade, ADMA Biologics, Inc. and ImmunityBio, Inc. have demonstrated distinct approaches to managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, ADMA Biologics saw a steady increase in SG&A expenses, growing by approximately 1,100%, reflecting their strategic investments in growth and development. In contrast, ImmunityBio's expenses fluctuated significantly, peaking in 2015 with a staggering 5,200% increase compared to the previous year, before stabilizing in recent years. This divergence highlights the varied financial strategies within the biotech sector, where companies balance between aggressive expansion and sustainable growth. As the industry evolves, these insights provide a window into the financial health and strategic priorities of these innovative firms.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025