Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. vs ImmunityBio, Inc.

SG&A Expenses: A Decade of Growth and Strategy in Biotech

__timestampImmunityBio, Inc.Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014432600010337679
Thursday, January 1, 201522620600018187286
Friday, January 1, 20169439100024758063
Sunday, January 1, 20175382100023666957
Monday, January 1, 20183546300030099855
Tuesday, January 1, 20194645600064947625
Wednesday, January 1, 202071318000186363444
Friday, January 1, 2021135256000272611040
Saturday, January 1, 2022102708000358782000
Sunday, January 1, 2023129620000409864000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. vs ImmunityBio, Inc.

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, understanding the financial strategies of leading companies is crucial. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. and ImmunityBio, Inc. over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. has seen a staggering increase in SG&A expenses, growing nearly 40 times from 2014 to 2023. In contrast, ImmunityBio, Inc. experienced a more volatile trajectory, with a peak in 2015 and fluctuations thereafter. By 2023, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.'s SG&A expenses were approximately 3.2 times higher than those of ImmunityBio, Inc. This trend highlights the aggressive expansion and operational strategies of Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc., positioning it as a formidable player in the biotech sector. Investors and stakeholders should consider these financial dynamics when evaluating potential growth and investment opportunities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025