Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: ImmunityBio, Inc. vs Dynavax Technologies Corporation

Biotech SG&A Expenses: ImmunityBio vs Dynavax

__timestampDynavax Technologies CorporationImmunityBio, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014177630004326000
Thursday, January 1, 201522180000226206000
Friday, January 1, 20163725700094391000
Sunday, January 1, 20172736700053821000
Monday, January 1, 20186477000035463000
Tuesday, January 1, 20197498600046456000
Wednesday, January 1, 20207925600071318000
Friday, January 1, 2021100156000135256000
Saturday, January 1, 2022131408000102708000
Sunday, January 1, 2023152946000129620000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: ImmunityBio, Inc. vs Dynavax Technologies Corporation

In the ever-evolving biotech industry, understanding financial trends is crucial for investors and stakeholders. This analysis focuses on the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two prominent companies: ImmunityBio, Inc. and Dynavax Technologies Corporation, from 2014 to 2023.

Key Insights

Over the past decade, Dynavax Technologies has seen a steady increase in SG&A expenses, peaking in 2023 with a 760% rise from 2014. ImmunityBio, Inc., on the other hand, experienced a more volatile trajectory, with a significant spike in 2015, marking a 5,130% increase from the previous year. By 2023, ImmunityBio's expenses were approximately 30% lower than their 2015 peak.

Conclusion

These trends highlight the strategic financial decisions made by each company, reflecting their growth strategies and market positioning. Investors should consider these patterns when evaluating potential opportunities in the biotech sector.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025