| __timestamp | Lam Research Corporation | Microsoft Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 613341000 | 20488000000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 591611000 | 20324000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 630954000 | 19198000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 667485000 | 19942000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 762219000 | 22223000000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 702407000 | 23098000000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 682479000 | 24709000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 829875000 | 25224000000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 885737000 | 27725000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 832753000 | 30334000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 868247000 | 32065000000 |
Infusing magic into the data realm
In the ever-evolving tech industry, understanding the financial strategies of giants like Microsoft and Lam Research is crucial. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2024, Microsoft has consistently outpaced Lam Research in Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. Microsoft's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 56%, reaching a peak of $32 billion in 2024. In contrast, Lam Research's expenses have grown by about 42%, culminating at nearly $870 million in the same year.
This disparity highlights Microsoft's expansive operational scale and its strategic investments in marketing and administration. Meanwhile, Lam Research, a key player in semiconductor manufacturing, maintains a leaner approach, focusing on efficiency. This financial narrative underscores the diverse strategies employed by tech leaders to navigate market dynamics and drive growth.
Revenue Showdown: Microsoft Corporation vs Lam Research Corporation
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Microsoft Corporation vs Lam Research Corporation
Gross Profit Analysis: Comparing Microsoft Corporation and Lam Research Corporation
Microsoft Corporation or KLA Corporation: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Research and Development Expenses Breakdown: Microsoft Corporation vs Lam Research Corporation
Microsoft Corporation or Infosys Limited: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
EBITDA Performance Review: Microsoft Corporation vs Lam Research Corporation
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs MicroStrategy Incorporated
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Microsoft Corporation vs Amphenol Corporation
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Microsoft Corporation vs Marvell Technology, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Intel Corporation