Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Novo Nordisk A/S vs Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

SG&A Expenses: Novo Nordisk vs Rhythm Pharmaceuticals

__timestampNovo Nordisk A/SRhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014267600000001213000
Thursday, January 1, 2015321690000003425000
Friday, January 1, 2016323390000006311000
Sunday, January 1, 2017321240000009518000
Monday, January 1, 20183331300000028080000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193583000000036550000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203688600000046125000
Friday, January 1, 20214105800000068486000
Saturday, January 1, 20225068400000092032000
Sunday, January 1, 202361598000000117532000
Monday, January 1, 202467377000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

A Tale of Two Companies: SG&A Expenses Over Time

In the world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability and growth. This chart provides a fascinating comparison between Novo Nordisk A/S and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Novo Nordisk's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 130%, reflecting its expansive global operations and marketing efforts. In contrast, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, a smaller player, has seen its SG&A expenses grow by nearly 9,600%, indicative of its aggressive market entry and expansion strategies.

Novo Nordisk, a Danish multinational, has consistently maintained a robust financial position, with SG&A expenses peaking at around 61.6 billion in 2023. Meanwhile, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, based in the U.S., has steadily increased its spending, reaching approximately 117.5 million in the same year. This stark contrast highlights the diverse strategies and scales of operation within the pharmaceutical industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025