Bristol-Myers Squibb Company or ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Bristol-Myers vs. ACADIA

__timestampACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Wednesday, January 1, 2014327480005699000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015908040005001000000
Friday, January 1, 20161864560005002000000
Sunday, January 1, 20172550620004849000000
Monday, January 1, 20182657580004551000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193256380004871000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203886610007661000000
Friday, January 1, 20213960280007690000000
Saturday, January 1, 20223690900007814000000
Sunday, January 1, 20234024660007772000000
Monday, January 1, 20248414000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

SG&A Cost Management: Bristol-Myers Squibb vs. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals

In the competitive landscape of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management.

A Decade of Financial Insights

From 2014 to 2023, Bristol-Myers Squibb consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $7.8 billion in 2022. This reflects their expansive operations and significant market presence. In contrast, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals, a smaller entity, managed to keep its SG&A expenses under $400 million until 2023, showcasing a more conservative financial strategy.

Strategic Implications

While Bristol-Myers Squibb's larger SG&A costs might indicate robust growth and investment in market expansion, ACADIA's leaner approach suggests a focus on efficiency and cost control. Investors and stakeholders should consider these strategies when evaluating the companies' long-term financial health and market strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025