Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biopharma SG&A Expenses: ACADIA vs. BioCryst

__timestampACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014327480007461000
Thursday, January 1, 20159080400013047000
Friday, January 1, 201618645600011253000
Sunday, January 1, 201725506200013933000
Monday, January 1, 201826575800029514000
Tuesday, January 1, 201932563800037121000
Wednesday, January 1, 202038866100067929000
Friday, January 1, 2021396028000118818000
Saturday, January 1, 2022369090000159371000
Sunday, January 1, 2023402466000213894000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Biopharma Companies

In the competitive world of biopharmaceuticals, operational efficiency is key. Over the past decade, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have shown contrasting trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, ACADIA's SG&A expenses surged by over 1,100%, peaking in 2023. This reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in operational capabilities. In contrast, BioCryst's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 2,800% during the same period, indicating a strategic shift towards scaling operations. Notably, in 2023, BioCryst's expenses reached nearly 53% of ACADIA's, up from just 23% in 2014. This data highlights the dynamic strategies of these companies as they navigate the challenges of the pharmaceutical industry. Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into their operational priorities and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025