Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored

Cost Efficiency: Bristol-Myers Squibb vs. HUTCHMED

__timestampBristol-Myers Squibb CompanyHUTCHMED (China) Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 2014393200000072049000
Thursday, January 1, 20153909000000110777000
Friday, January 1, 20164946000000156328000
Sunday, January 1, 20176066000000175820000
Monday, January 1, 20186547000000143944000
Tuesday, January 1, 20198078000000160152000
Wednesday, January 1, 202011773000000188519000
Friday, January 1, 20219940000000258234000
Saturday, January 1, 202210137000000311103000
Sunday, January 1, 202310693000000384447000
Monday, January 1, 202411949000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Exploring Cost Efficiency: Bristol-Myers Squibb vs. HUTCHMED

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical landscape, cost efficiency is a critical metric for success. This analysis delves into the cost of revenue trends for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and HUTCHMED (China) Limited from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Bristol-Myers Squibb demonstrated a significant increase in cost efficiency, with their cost of revenue growing by approximately 172%, from $3.9 billion in 2014 to $10.7 billion in 2023. In contrast, HUTCHMED's cost of revenue rose by about 434%, from $72 million to $384 million, reflecting their expanding operations.

While Bristol-Myers Squibb's larger scale is evident, HUTCHMED's rapid growth highlights its emerging presence in the industry. This comparison underscores the diverse strategies employed by pharmaceutical giants and emerging players alike, offering insights into their operational efficiencies and market dynamics.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025