Catalent, Inc. or Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Catalent vs. Arrowhead: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampArrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Catalent, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201424419536334800000
Thursday, January 1, 201534718089337300000
Friday, January 1, 201640998209358100000
Sunday, January 1, 201732022880402600000
Monday, January 1, 201819110051462600000
Tuesday, January 1, 201926556257512000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202052275890577900000
Friday, January 1, 202180981000687000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022124431000844000000
Sunday, January 1, 202390932000831000000
Monday, January 1, 202498761000935000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Catalent vs. Arrowhead: A Decade of SG&A Management

In the competitive landscape of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Catalent, Inc. and Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management.

From 2014 to 2024, Catalent's SG&A expenses have consistently been higher, peaking at approximately 935% of Arrowhead's expenses in 2024. Despite this, Catalent's expenses have shown a steady growth trend, reflecting its expansive operational scale. In contrast, Arrowhead's SG&A costs have fluctuated, with a notable increase of over 400% from 2014 to 2022, indicating strategic investments in growth.

This data highlights the different strategies employed by these companies: Catalent's focus on scale and Arrowhead's targeted growth. Investors and industry analysts can glean insights into each company's operational priorities and financial health through these trends.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025