Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: ASML Holding N.V. vs Teledyne Technologies Incorporated

ASML vs. Teledyne: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampASML Holding N.V.Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 201433589070001487100000
Thursday, January 1, 201533917000001427800000
Friday, January 1, 201637503000001308800000
Sunday, January 1, 201749761000001612200000
Monday, January 1, 201862257000001791000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201969199000001920300000
Wednesday, January 1, 202071813000001905300000
Friday, January 1, 202188020000002772900000
Saturday, January 1, 2022106607000003128300000
Sunday, January 1, 2023134224000003196100000
Monday, January 1, 202413770900000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

A Decade of Cost Efficiency: ASML vs. Teledyne

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology and innovation, cost efficiency remains a pivotal factor for success. Over the past decade, ASML Holding N.V. and Teledyne Technologies Incorporated have showcased contrasting trajectories in managing their cost of revenue.

From 2014 to 2023, ASML's cost of revenue surged by approximately 300%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and investment in cutting-edge semiconductor technology. In contrast, Teledyne's cost of revenue increased by about 115%, indicating a more conservative growth strategy.

By 2023, ASML's cost of revenue reached a peak, nearly quadrupling its 2014 figures, while Teledyne's costs more than doubled. This divergence highlights ASML's commitment to scaling operations, whereas Teledyne focuses on steady, sustainable growth.

These insights offer a glimpse into the strategic priorities of two industry giants, each navigating the complexities of cost management in their unique ways.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025