Cost of Revenue Comparison: Gilead Sciences, Inc. vs Grifols, S.A.

Biopharma Giants' Revenue Costs: A Decade of Growth

__timestampGilead Sciences, Inc.Grifols, S.A.
Wednesday, January 1, 201437880000001656170000
Thursday, January 1, 201540060000002003565000
Friday, January 1, 201642610000002137539000
Sunday, January 1, 201743710000002166062000
Monday, January 1, 201848530000002437164000
Tuesday, January 1, 201946750000002757459000
Wednesday, January 1, 202045720000003084873000
Friday, January 1, 202166010000002970522000
Saturday, January 1, 202256570000003832437000
Sunday, January 1, 202364980000004269276000
Monday, January 1, 202428675800000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Biopharma Giants

In the competitive landscape of biopharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Grifols, S.A. have been pivotal players. From 2014 to 2023, Gilead's cost of revenue surged by approximately 72%, peaking in 2021. This reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in groundbreaking therapies. Meanwhile, Grifols, S.A. saw a remarkable 158% increase, highlighting their strategic focus on plasma-derived medicines.

A Decade of Growth

Gilead's cost of revenue consistently outpaced Grifols, with a notable spike in 2021, reaching nearly 6.6 billion. In contrast, Grifols steadily climbed, culminating in 2023 with a cost of revenue of over 4.2 billion. This growth trajectory underscores the dynamic nature of the biopharma industry, where innovation and strategic investments drive financial outcomes.

As these companies continue to evolve, their financial strategies will be crucial in shaping the future of healthcare.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025