__timestamp | Eli Lilly and Company | United Therapeutics Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 6620800000 | 381287000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 6533000000 | 452612000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 6452000000 | 316800000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 6588100000 | 330100000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 5975100000 | 265800000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 6213800000 | 336200000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 6121200000 | 423900000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 6431600000 | 467000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 6440400000 | 487000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 6941200000 | 477100000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 8593800000 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Eli Lilly and Company and United Therapeutics Corporation have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A efficiency.
Eli Lilly, a global leader, has consistently maintained high SG&A expenses, averaging around $6.4 billion annually from 2014 to 2023. Despite fluctuations, their expenses peaked in 2023, reflecting a strategic investment in marketing and administration. In contrast, United Therapeutics, a smaller player, has kept its SG&A expenses significantly lower, averaging approximately $394 million annually. This lean approach highlights their focus on operational efficiency.
The data reveals a 10% increase in Eli Lilly's SG&A expenses over the decade, while United Therapeutics saw a 25% rise, albeit from a smaller base. These trends underscore the diverse strategies employed by these companies in navigating the pharmaceutical market.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Eli Lilly and Company vs Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. Trends and Insights
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Eli Lilly and Company vs Verona Pharma plc
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Eli Lilly and Company vs MorphoSys AG
Eli Lilly and Company vs Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Gilead Sciences, Inc. vs United Therapeutics Corporation: SG&A Expense Trends
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of United Therapeutics Corporation and Genmab A/S
United Therapeutics Corporation and Bio-Techne Corporation: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: United Therapeutics Corporation vs Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing United Therapeutics Corporation and Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: United Therapeutics Corporation vs Bausch Health Companies Inc. Trends and Insights
United Therapeutics Corporation vs Vericel Corporation: SG&A Expense Trends
United Therapeutics Corporation vs Xencor, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends