SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Eli Lilly and Company and United Therapeutics Corporation

SG&A Efficiency: Eli Lilly vs. United Therapeutics

__timestampEli Lilly and CompanyUnited Therapeutics Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20146620800000381287000
Thursday, January 1, 20156533000000452612000
Friday, January 1, 20166452000000316800000
Sunday, January 1, 20176588100000330100000
Monday, January 1, 20185975100000265800000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196213800000336200000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206121200000423900000
Friday, January 1, 20216431600000467000000
Saturday, January 1, 20226440400000487000000
Sunday, January 1, 20236941200000477100000
Monday, January 1, 20248593800000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Eli Lilly and Company and United Therapeutics Corporation have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A efficiency.

Eli Lilly, a global leader, has consistently maintained high SG&A expenses, averaging around $6.4 billion annually from 2014 to 2023. Despite fluctuations, their expenses peaked in 2023, reflecting a strategic investment in marketing and administration. In contrast, United Therapeutics, a smaller player, has kept its SG&A expenses significantly lower, averaging approximately $394 million annually. This lean approach highlights their focus on operational efficiency.

The data reveals a 10% increase in Eli Lilly's SG&A expenses over the decade, while United Therapeutics saw a 25% rise, albeit from a smaller base. These trends underscore the diverse strategies employed by these companies in navigating the pharmaceutical market.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025