SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing TG Therapeutics, Inc. and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotech SG&A: TG vs. CymaBay's Decade of Spending

__timestampCymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.TG Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014818500024518692
Thursday, January 1, 2015887100019886580
Friday, January 1, 2016964500012631689
Sunday, January 1, 20171238700021977998
Monday, January 1, 20181438100020759000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191923800020838000
Wednesday, January 1, 202017425000121812000
Friday, January 1, 202123040000152137000
Saturday, January 1, 20222511600083231000
Sunday, January 1, 202351953000122706000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing operational expenses is crucial for success. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of TG Therapeutics, Inc. and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. over the past decade.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

From 2014 to 2023, TG Therapeutics, Inc. has consistently outpaced CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. in SG&A spending, peaking at approximately $152 million in 2021. This represents a staggering 520% increase from their 2014 expenses. In contrast, CymaBay's SG&A expenses grew by about 535% over the same period, reaching nearly $52 million in 2023.

Strategic Implications

These figures highlight the aggressive expansion strategies of both companies. While TG Therapeutics' higher spending suggests a robust push for market dominance, CymaBay's more conservative approach may indicate a focus on sustainable growth. Investors and stakeholders should consider these trends when evaluating the companies' future potential.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025