__timestamp | CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. | TG Therapeutics, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 8185000 | 24518692 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 8871000 | 19886580 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 9645000 | 12631689 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 12387000 | 21977998 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 14381000 | 20759000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 19238000 | 20838000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 17425000 | 121812000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 23040000 | 152137000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 25116000 | 83231000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 51953000 | 122706000 |
In pursuit of knowledge
In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing operational expenses is crucial for success. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of TG Therapeutics, Inc. and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. over the past decade.
From 2014 to 2023, TG Therapeutics, Inc. has consistently outpaced CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. in SG&A spending, peaking at approximately $152 million in 2021. This represents a staggering 520% increase from their 2014 expenses. In contrast, CymaBay's SG&A expenses grew by about 535% over the same period, reaching nearly $52 million in 2023.
These figures highlight the aggressive expansion strategies of both companies. While TG Therapeutics' higher spending suggests a robust push for market dominance, CymaBay's more conservative approach may indicate a focus on sustainable growth. Investors and stakeholders should consider these trends when evaluating the companies' future potential.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Merck & Co., Inc. and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Zoetis Inc. vs TG Therapeutics, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Summit Therapeutics Inc. vs TG Therapeutics, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Insmed Incorporated vs CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. vs CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Grifols, S.A. vs TG Therapeutics, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Cytokinetics, Incorporated or TG Therapeutics, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing TG Therapeutics, Inc. and Veracyte, Inc.
CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. vs ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. or Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.