__timestamp | Cytokinetics, Incorporated | Pfizer Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 17268000 | 14097000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 19667000 | 14809000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 27823000 | 14837000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 36468000 | 14784000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 31282000 | 14455000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 39610000 | 14350000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 52820000 | 11615000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 96803000 | 12703000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 177977000 | 13677000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 173612000 | 14771000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 14730000000 |
Cracking the code
In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, understanding the financial strategies of major players is crucial. Over the past decade, Pfizer Inc. and Cytokinetics, Incorporated have shown contrasting trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses.
From 2014 to 2023, Pfizer's SG&A expenses have remained relatively stable, averaging around $14 billion annually. This consistency reflects Pfizer's robust operational strategies and its ability to maintain efficiency despite market fluctuations.
In contrast, Cytokinetics has seen a dramatic increase in SG&A expenses, growing over 900% from 2014 to 2023. This surge indicates aggressive expansion and investment in marketing and administrative capabilities, positioning itself as a formidable competitor.
These insights highlight the diverse approaches within the industry, offering a glimpse into the strategic priorities of these two companies.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Pfizer Inc. vs Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Pfizer Inc. vs GSK plc
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Pfizer Inc. or Pharming Group N.V.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Pfizer Inc. and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Pfizer Inc. or Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Pfizer Inc. vs Mesoblast Limited
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Pfizer Inc. vs Dynavax Technologies Corporation
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Cytokinetics, Incorporated
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. vs Cytokinetics, Incorporated: SG&A Expense Trends
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for BeiGene, Ltd. and Cytokinetics, Incorporated
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Genmab A/S or Cytokinetics, Incorporated
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Cytokinetics, Incorporated and Soleno Therapeutics, Inc.