| __timestamp | Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. | Microsoft Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 384921000 | 20488000000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 451785000 | 20324000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 508656000 | 19198000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 525392000 | 19942000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 589799000 | 22223000000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 658400000 | 23098000000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 681400000 | 24709000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 708500000 | 25224000000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 791300000 | 27725000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 864100000 | 30334000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 32065000000 |
Infusing magic into the data realm
In the ever-evolving tech landscape, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for sustained growth. From 2014 to 2023, Microsoft Corporation and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. have showcased distinct trajectories in their SG&A strategies. Microsoft's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 48%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and innovation strategies. In contrast, Check Point Software's expenses grew by about 124%, indicating a more conservative yet steady approach. Notably, Microsoft's expenses consistently outpaced Check Point's by a factor of nearly 40, underscoring its vast operational scale. However, 2024 data for Check Point is missing, leaving room for speculation on its future financial maneuvers. This comparison not only highlights the diverse strategies of these tech titans but also offers insights into their financial health and market positioning.
Microsoft Corporation vs Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.: Examining Key Revenue Metrics
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Microsoft Corporation vs Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Gross Profit Comparison: Microsoft Corporation and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. Trends
R&D Insights: How Microsoft Corporation and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. Allocate Funds
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Microsoft Corporation vs PTC Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Microsoft Corporation and Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Microsoft Corporation vs Seagate Technology Holdings plc
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Microsoft Corporation or ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs STMicroelectronics N.V.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Microsoft Corporation and Zebra Technologies Corporation
Microsoft Corporation and Pure Storage, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Microsoft Corporation and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.: A Detailed Examination of EBITDA Performance