__timestamp | Microsoft Corporation | Zebra Technologies Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 20488000000 | 351518000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 20324000000 | 763025000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 19198000000 | 751000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 19942000000 | 749000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 22223000000 | 811000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 23098000000 | 826000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 24709000000 | 787000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 25224000000 | 935000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 27725000000 | 982000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 30334000000 | 915000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 32065000000 | 981000000 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding operational efficiency is crucial. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Microsoft Corporation and Zebra Technologies Corporation from 2014 to 2023. Microsoft, a titan in the tech industry, has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 56% over the decade, reflecting its expansive growth and strategic investments. In contrast, Zebra Technologies, a leader in enterprise asset intelligence, has maintained a more stable SG&A expense profile, with a modest increase of around 160% over the same period. This disparity highlights the differing scales and strategies of these companies. While Microsoft's expenses surged, Zebra's more conservative approach suggests a focus on efficiency. Notably, data for 2024 is incomplete, indicating potential shifts in strategy or reporting. This comparison underscores the diverse paths companies take in managing operational costs.
Who Generates More Revenue? Microsoft Corporation or Zebra Technologies Corporation
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Microsoft Corporation vs Zebra Technologies Corporation
Who Generates Higher Gross Profit? Microsoft Corporation or Zebra Technologies Corporation
Comparing Innovation Spending: Microsoft Corporation and Zebra Technologies Corporation
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Microsoft Corporation and Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Microsoft Corporation vs Seagate Technology Holdings plc
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Microsoft Corporation or ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Microsoft Corporation and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs STMicroelectronics N.V.
Microsoft Corporation and Pure Storage, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Microsoft Corporation and SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
EBITDA Performance Review: Microsoft Corporation vs Zebra Technologies Corporation