SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Microsoft Corporation and Adobe Inc.

SG&A Efficiency: Microsoft vs. Adobe Over a Decade

__timestampAdobe Inc.Microsoft Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014221514000020488000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015221516100020324000000
Friday, January 1, 2016248790700019198000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017282229800019942000000
Monday, January 1, 2018336572700022223000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019412498400023098000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020455900000024709000000
Friday, January 1, 2021540600000025224000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022618700000027725000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023676400000030334000000
Monday, January 1, 2024729300000032065000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Tech Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, Microsoft Corporation and Adobe Inc. have consistently demonstrated their prowess. A key metric in evaluating their operational efficiency is the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2024, Microsoft has maintained a robust SG&A strategy, with expenses growing by approximately 56%, reflecting its expansive growth and strategic investments. Adobe, on the other hand, has seen a remarkable 229% increase in SG&A expenses, indicative of its aggressive market expansion and innovation-driven approach.

A Decade of Strategic Growth

In 2014, Microsoft's SG&A expenses were nearly nine times that of Adobe's. Fast forward to 2024, and while Microsoft continues to lead, Adobe's expenses have surged, narrowing the gap significantly. This trend underscores Adobe's commitment to scaling its operations and enhancing its market presence. As these tech titans continue to innovate, their SG&A strategies will remain pivotal in shaping their future trajectories.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025