__timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 5229000000 | 410731000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 5707000000 | 532350000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 6314000000 | 800489000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 8005000000 | 886425000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 9436000000 | 2051100000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 8222000000 | 2611700000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 9510000000 | 2574100000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 12149000000 | 2641700000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 13792000000 | 2767700000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 14133000000 | 2851000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 14279000000 | 3018400000 |
Unleashing insights
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding cost structures is crucial. From 2014 to 2023, Applied Materials, Inc. and SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. have showcased distinct trajectories in their cost of revenue. Applied Materials, a leader in materials engineering solutions, saw its cost of revenue grow by approximately 172%, peaking in 2023. This reflects its expanding operations and market reach. In contrast, SS&C Technologies, a key player in financial services software, experienced a 594% increase, highlighting its aggressive growth strategy.
Interestingly, while Applied Materials consistently outpaced SS&C in absolute terms, the latter's rapid percentage growth underscores its dynamic adaptation in a competitive market. The data for 2024 remains incomplete, offering a tantalizing glimpse into future trends. This comparison not only highlights the strategic differences between these giants but also offers insights into the broader tech industry's cost management strategies.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Pure Storage, Inc.
Annual Revenue Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. vs SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and Zebra Technologies Corporation
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. vs ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Applied Materials, Inc. vs VeriSign, Inc.
Gross Profit Analysis: Comparing Applied Materials, Inc. and SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Applied Materials, Inc. and Leidos Holdings, Inc.'s Expenses
Analyzing R&D Budgets: Applied Materials, Inc. vs SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
EBITDA Performance Review: Applied Materials, Inc. vs SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.