| __timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 5229000000 | 173337000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 5707000000 | 331073000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 6314000000 | 355414000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 8005000000 | 429613000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 9436000000 | 487695000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 8222000000 | 530669000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 9510000000 | 596363000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 12149000000 | 559819000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 13792000000 | 764707000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 14133000000 | 1030138999 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 14279000000 | 0 |
Unlocking the unknown
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology and financial services, understanding cost structures is crucial. Applied Materials, Inc., a leader in materials engineering solutions, and FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc., a global business payments company, offer a fascinating study in contrasts. From 2014 to 2023, Applied Materials saw its cost of revenue soar by approximately 171%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and innovation strategies. In contrast, FLEETCOR's cost of revenue grew by about 494% over the same period, indicating its rapid scaling and diversification in the payments sector.
Interestingly, while Applied Materials consistently reported data through 2024, FLEETCOR's data for 2024 is missing, hinting at potential reporting delays or strategic shifts. This analysis underscores the dynamic nature of these industries and the importance of cost management in sustaining growth and competitiveness.
Who Generates More Revenue? Applied Materials, Inc. or FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and Seagate Technology Holdings plc
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Western Digital Corporation
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Pure Storage, Inc.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and Zebra Technologies Corporation
Applied Materials, Inc. vs ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Key Insights on Gross Profit: Applied Materials, Inc. vs FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Applied Materials, Inc. vs VeriSign, Inc.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. vs SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Applied Materials, Inc. and FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. vs FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc.: In-Depth EBITDA Performance Comparison