| __timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | Zebra Technologies Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 5229000000 | 892547000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 5707000000 | 2007739000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 6314000000 | 1932000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 8005000000 | 2012000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 9436000000 | 2237000000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 8222000000 | 2385000000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 9510000000 | 2445000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 12149000000 | 2999000000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 13792000000 | 3157000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 14133000000 | 2461000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 14279000000 | 2568000000 |
Infusing magic into the data realm
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for evaluating a company's financial health. Applied Materials, Inc. and Zebra Technologies Corporation, two titans in their respective fields, offer a fascinating study in contrasts. From 2014 to 2023, Applied Materials saw a staggering 170% increase in its cost of revenue, peaking at approximately $14.1 billion in 2023. This growth reflects its expanding operations and market dominance. In contrast, Zebra Technologies experienced a more modest 176% rise, reaching around $3.2 billion in 2022, before a slight dip in 2023. The missing data for Zebra in 2024 suggests potential volatility or strategic shifts. This analysis underscores the dynamic nature of the tech industry, where cost management is as critical as innovation.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and Seagate Technology Holdings plc
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Western Digital Corporation
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Zebra Technologies Corporation: Examining Key Revenue Metrics
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Pure Storage, Inc.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. vs ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Gross Profit Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. and Zebra Technologies Corporation Trends
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Applied Materials, Inc. vs VeriSign, Inc.
R&D Insights: How Applied Materials, Inc. and Zebra Technologies Corporation Allocate Funds
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Applied Materials, Inc. and Zebra Technologies Corporation
A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: Applied Materials, Inc. and Zebra Technologies Corporation