__timestamp | HUTCHMED (China) Limited | Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 72049000 | 21226345 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 110777000 | 139626 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 156328000 | 93831530 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 175820000 | 79419009 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 143944000 | 368673 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 160152000 | 477121 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 188519000 | 1895029 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 258234000 | 8034589 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 311103000 | 20443000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 384447000 | 33745000 |
Unleashing insights
In the dynamic world of pharmaceuticals, understanding cost structures is crucial. This chart compares the cost of revenue for Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. and HUTCHMED (China) Limited from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, HUTCHMED's cost of revenue surged by over 400%, peaking in 2023. In contrast, Intra-Cellular Therapies experienced a more modest increase, with a notable spike in 2016.
HUTCHMED's consistent growth reflects its expanding market presence in China, while Intra-Cellular's fluctuations suggest strategic shifts in its product offerings. By 2023, HUTCHMED's cost of revenue was nearly 11 times that of Intra-Cellular, highlighting its larger scale of operations. This comparison underscores the diverse strategies and market dynamics influencing these two pharmaceutical giants.
Investors and analysts should consider these trends when evaluating the financial health and strategic direction of these companies.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Novo Nordisk A/S and Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Merck & Co., Inc. and Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.
Pfizer Inc. vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.
Cost of Revenue Trends: Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. and Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. vs MiMedx Group, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Cost of Revenue Trends: Pharming Group N.V. vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Cost of Revenue Trends: ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Cost of Revenue Comparison: HUTCHMED (China) Limited vs Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: HUTCHMED (China) Limited vs Wave Life Sciences Ltd.