Gilead Sciences, Inc. or Grifols, S.A.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Gilead vs. Grifols: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampGilead Sciences, Inc.Grifols, S.A.
Wednesday, January 1, 20142983000000660772000
Thursday, January 1, 20153426000000736435000
Friday, January 1, 20163398000000775266000
Sunday, January 1, 20173878000000860348000
Monday, January 1, 20184056000000814775000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194381000000942821000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205151000000985616000
Friday, January 1, 202152460000001061508000
Saturday, January 1, 202256730000001190423000
Sunday, January 1, 202360900000001254234000
Monday, January 1, 20246091000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Gilead Sciences vs. Grifols: A Decade of SG&A Management

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Grifols, S.A. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to handling these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Gilead Sciences consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $6.1 billion in 2023, a 104% increase from 2014. In contrast, Grifols, S.A. maintained a more conservative growth, with expenses rising by 90% to about $1.25 billion in the same period.

This disparity highlights Gilead's aggressive investment in administrative and sales functions, potentially fueling its expansive market reach. Meanwhile, Grifols' steady approach suggests a focus on cost efficiency. As investors and industry analysts evaluate these strategies, the question remains: which company will sustain its competitive edge in the long run?

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025